Following the recent flap over Andrew Wakefield's fall from grace, I am reminded again of the fact that science is an ongoing investigation. There can seldom be an absolute conclusion; especially in medicine, which is part art, part magic and part human cussedness. I am convinced that in a distant future our offspring will look back upon chemotherapy as insane barbarism. But for now, it's our best shot, and a therapy, though imperfect, that has saved many thousands of lives in spite of the wretched side effects.
Speaking of shots, what about childhood immunizations?
Wakefield is defending his position. As a recap, his article in the British journal Lancet with 12 other authors, linking autism to the MMR vaccine, has been retracted; and 10 of the 13 authors have recanted. Brian Deer, writing for the British Medical Journal, calls the article deliberate fraud.
Wakefield insists that the backlash is spurred by big pharma, who don't want consumers to know how dangerous their vaccines are. I read The Pandora Prescription by James Sheridon about the mafia-like drug makers' conspiracy to keep diseases from being cured, and Jodi Picoult's book House Rules, about an autistic teen.
I understand the strong emotions surrounding the autism debate. Who can resist Jenny McCarthy? It becomes moot whether she is on to something or she is dead wrong, deluded by her love for her child. It is her love that is true. And it is our love of truth that should underlay our pursuit of science. The science in this case is as frustrating as science always is and always has been. We have a theory, we test it, we prove it under as many circumstances as possible, and eventually we have to revise our earlier thinking. I have read that fully 40% of the information in most prestigious medical journals is proven false within ten years. That's the main "truth" of science. It's always progressing.
I love children, and loved being a mother. I don't love quarreling, but I am a huge fan of discussion and discovery. I would love it if Wakefield, Deer, McCarthy, and everyone who has cause to follow research on autism, would think of their quest as a mutual passion for answers and not waste time denouncing each other.